PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPLB vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPLB vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLB achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 50.16% return.


CPLB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.02%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
-1.13%
1M
-18.58%
YTD
50.16%
6M
47.74%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLB vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CPLB
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
0.79%7.76%4.19%7.16%-14.44%0.35%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
50.16%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLB and DBO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021

-0.14

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CPLB and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.14 to -0.37, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPLB vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLB
CPLB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CPLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLB vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPLBDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.58

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

4.29

+0.70

CPLB vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLB and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPLB vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLB drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLB and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPLBDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-90.18%

+71.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.60%

-23.03%

+20.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.90%

-28.20%

+22.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-60.48%

+59.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-62.22%

+55.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

8.51%

-7.61%

Volatility

CPLB vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) is 0.99%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that CPLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPLBDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

10.29%

-9.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

29.36%

-26.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

34.89%

-31.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

32.54%

-27.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

31.81%

-26.79%

CPLB vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPLB vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

CPLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than DBO's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CPLB
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
5.49%5.46%5.40%4.82%3.17%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.34%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPLB and DBO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to CPLB (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLB dropped -18.96% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.32% vs 5.66% for CPLB. On fees, CPLB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, CPLB has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPLB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

CPLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 2.34% for DBO.

CPLB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CPLB and 0.78% for DBO.

CPLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPLB and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer