PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPER vs. ERO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPER vs. ERO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and Ero Copper Corp (ERO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPER achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than ERO's 9.47% return.


CPER

1D
-2.91%
1M
10.79%
YTD
12.76%
6M
19.35%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
10.91%

ERO

1D
-3.82%
1M
26.61%
YTD
9.47%
6M
22.85%
1Y
111.40%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPER vs. ERO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPER
United States Copper Index Fund
12.76%38.95%4.23%4.55%-15.14%25.21%23.90%6.66%-21.91%3.23%
ERO
Ero Copper Corp
9.47%109.87%-14.63%14.84%-10.07%-5.73%-10.97%151.68%21.41%52.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CPER and ERO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.48

The correlation between CPER and ERO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPER vs. ERO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPER
CPER Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CPER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPER Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPER Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CPER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPER Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ERO
ERO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ERO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ERO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPER vs. ERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) and Ero Copper Corp (ERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPERERODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

2.03

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

2.43

-1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.95

-1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.50

6.53

-4.03

CPER vs. ERO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPER Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the ERO Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPER and ERO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPERERODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.03

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.11

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.54

-0.40

Drawdowns

CPER vs. ERO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPER drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum ERO drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPER and ERO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPERERODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.04%

-67.17%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.77%

-37.97%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-59.84%

+35.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.75%

-64.56%

+29.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.91%

-18.56%

+15.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.41%

-27.05%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.93%

17.13%

-5.20%

Volatility

CPER vs. ERO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) is 9.73%, while Ero Copper Corp (ERO) has a volatility of 20.07%. This indicates that CPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPERERODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.73%

20.07%

-10.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.85%

42.84%

-19.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.48%

55.27%

-20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.97%

54.41%

-27.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.04%

59.08%

-35.04%

Dividends

CPER vs. ERO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPER nor ERO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CPER and ERO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERO has higher volatility (20.07%) compared to CPER (9.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPER dropped -54.04% vs ERO's -67.17%.

ERO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPER and ERO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer