PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAI vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CPAI vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CPAI vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
4.21%17.79%28.37%6.69%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
1.15%31.55%3.49%5.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly higher than EFA's 1.15% return.


CPAI

1D
3.44%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
4.21%
6M
6.74%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFA

1D
3.25%
1M
-7.83%
YTD
1.15%
6M
5.91%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CPAI vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CPAI vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAI
CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAI vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPAIEFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.87

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.93

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.33

7.39

-0.05

CPAI vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and EFA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPAIEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.30

+1.03

Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and EFA is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CPAI vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than EFA's 3.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
0.86%0.89%0.41%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.34%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and EFA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAIEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-61.04%

+39.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-11.42%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-8.07%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-12.00%

+8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.98%

+0.54%

Volatility

CPAI vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) have volatilities of 7.88% and 7.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPAIEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

7.92%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

11.12%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.20%

17.71%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

16.31%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

17.20%

+2.01%