PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPAI vs. CTEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPAI vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 27.31% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 34.60% return.


CPAI

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.79%
6M
16.63%
YTD
27.31%
1Y
43.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTEF

1D
-2.30%
1M
1.32%
6M
29.15%
YTD
34.60%
1Y
69.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPAI vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
27.31%13.64%
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
34.60%33.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and CTEF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.69

The correlation between CPAI and CTEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPAI vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAI
CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CTEF
CTEF Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CTEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAI vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPAICTEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.48

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

4.64

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

21.02

-5.14

CPAI vs. CTEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the CTEF Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and CTEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and CTEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPAICTEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-15.00%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-15.00%

+4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-4.77%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-1.79%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.30%

-0.53%

Volatility

CPAI vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) is 5.93%, while Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that CPAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPAICTEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

8.60%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.71%

19.41%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

23.22%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.38%

22.65%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

22.65%

-3.27%

CPAI vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPAI vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
0.70%0.89%0.41%0.06%
CTEF
Castellan Targeted Equity ETF
0.06%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPAI and CTEF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTEF has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to CPAI (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPAI dropped -21.46% vs CTEF's -15.00%.

On 1-year performance, CTEF leads with 69.18% vs 43.95% for CPAI. On fees, CTEF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CPAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTEF has performed better with a 69.18% return vs 43.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CTEF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CPAI.

CPAI has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Funds and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CPAI and 0.45% for CTEF.

CTEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPAI and CTEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer