CPAI vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CPAI (Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPAI is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Counterpoint Funds, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. CPAI is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, CPAI returned 43.49% vs 64.31% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. CPAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

CPAI vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPAI achieves a 28.40% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 23.84% return.

CPAI

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 17.45%
• YTD: 28.40%
• 1Y: 43.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -2.41%
• 6M: 34.02%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 1Y: 64.31%
• 3Y*: -31.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPAI vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CPAI Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF	28.40%	17.79%	28.37%	5.67%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	23.84%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CPAI and BITI is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023	-0.39

Return for Risk

CPAI vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPAI

CPAI Risk / Return Rank: 87
CPAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CPAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CPAI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CPAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CPAI Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPAI vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPAI	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	1.46	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.03	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.24	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	2.56	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.75	6.37	+9.38

CPAI vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPAI and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPAI vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPAI drawdown since its inception was -21.46%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPAI and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPAI	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.46%	-92.16%	+70.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.48%	-25.28%	+14.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-86.48%	+85.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-68.36%	+65.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	10.13%	-7.35%

Volatility

CPAI vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) is 5.13%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that CPAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPAI	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	11.73%	-6.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	34.49%	-18.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.07%	44.24%	-25.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.37%	52.29%	-32.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.37%	52.29%	-32.92%

CPAI vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPAI vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

CPAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than BITI's 15.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.70%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
CPAI Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF	0.69%	0.89%	0.41%	0.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPAI and BITI in my portfolio?

CPAI and BITI have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPAI or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to CPAI (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPAI dropped -21.46% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, CPAI or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.31% vs 43.49% for CPAI. On fees, CPAI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CPAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPAI or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.31% return vs 43.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPAI or BITI?

CPAI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPAI or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.70%, compared with 0.69% for CPAI.

What is the main difference between CPAI and BITI?

CPAI is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Counterpoint Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CPAI and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.