PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COZX vs. GEVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COZX vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COZX achieves a 205.40% return, which is significantly higher than GEVG's 88.18% return.


COZX

1D
-0.24%
1M
78.54%
YTD
205.40%
6M
125.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GEVG

1D
-2.09%
1M
-22.22%
YTD
88.18%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COZX vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COZX
Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF
205.40%-4.56%
GEVG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF
88.18%-11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between COZX and GEVG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COZX vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CORZ Daily ETF (COZX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COZX vs. GEVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COZXGEVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

2.17

-1.94

Drawdowns

COZX vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COZX drawdown since its inception was -70.37%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COZX and GEVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COZXGEVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.37%

-33.81%

-36.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-32.62%

+32.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.31%

-9.25%

-35.06%

Volatility

COZX vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COZXGEVGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

138.53%

96.61%

+41.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

138.53%

96.61%

+41.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.53%

96.61%

+41.92%

COZX vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

COZX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

COZX vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison

Neither COZX nor GEVG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COZX and GEVG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for COZX.

COZX and GEVG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for COZX and 0.75% for GEVG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COZX and GEVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer