COW.TO vs. XHU.TO
COW.TO (iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF) and XHU.TO (iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - COW.TO tracks the Manulife Investment Management Global Agriculture Index while XHU.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COW.TO returned 8.59%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for XHU.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COW.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for XHU.TO.
Performance
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COW.TO achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than XHU.TO's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, COW.TO has outperformed XHU.TO with an annualized return of 8.59%, while XHU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.63% annualized return.
COW.TO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 9.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
XHU.TO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 13.95%
- 6M
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW.TO iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF | 15.84% | -0.67% | 5.62% | -8.61% | 12.64% | 19.02% | 11.66% | 25.91% | -14.26% | 14.84% |
XHU.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF | 13.95% | -0.28% | 16.64% | -1.52% | 12.37% | 18.23% | -9.27% | 13.08% | 3.95% | 5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between COW.TO and XHU.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015 | 0.47 |
The correlation between COW.TO and XHU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COW.TO
XHU.TO
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
COW.TO
XHU.TO
Industrials
COW.TO
XHU.TO
Basic Materials
COW.TO
XHU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
COW.TO
XHU.TO
Financial Services
COW.TO
XHU.TO
Communication Services
COW.TO
-
XHU.TO
Energy
COW.TO
-
XHU.TO
Healthcare
COW.TO
-
XHU.TO
Real Estate
COW.TO
-
XHU.TO
-
Technology
COW.TO
-
XHU.TO
Utilities
COW.TO
-
XHU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
COW.TO
XHU.TO
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO) and iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COW.TO | XHU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.58 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 5.48 | -3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COW.TO | XHU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.17 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.84 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COW.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than XHU.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COW.TO and XHU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COW.TO | XHU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -29.94% | -25.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -8.73% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.51% | -12.53% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.82% | -12.53% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | -29.94% | -6.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.17% | -1.84% | -5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.94% | -3.73% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 2.51% | +2.55% |
Volatility
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF (XHU.TO) at 3.53%. This indicates that COW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COW.TO | XHU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.53% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 10.28% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.68% | 11.79% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 11.89% | +6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 14.38% | +4.92% |
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COW.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than XHU.TO's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
COW.TO vs. XHU.TO - Dividend Comparison
COW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than XHU.TO's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW.TO iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF | 2.07% | 2.40% | 1.43% | 1.62% | 2.03% | 0.69% | 1.02% | 1.02% | 1.07% | 0.58% | 1.10% | 1.78% |
XHU.TO iShares U.S. High Dividend Equity Index ETF | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.72% | 2.86% | 2.63% | 2.60% | 3.18% | 2.25% | 2.52% | 2.27% | 2.38% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COW.TO and XHU.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHU.TO is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHU.TO is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for COW.TO.
COW.TO tracks Manulife Investment Management Global Agriculture Index, while XHU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for COW.TO and 0.34% for XHU.TO.
Find the right allocation for COW.TO and XHU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer