COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO
COW.TO (iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF) and DRFU.TO (Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. COW.TO is passively managed, while DRFU.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, COW.TO returned 4.75%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for DRFU.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with COW.TO having a 16.05% return and DRFU.TO slightly lower at 15.27%.
COW.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
DRFU.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- —
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW.TO iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF | 16.05% | -4.34% | 5.62% | -8.61% | 12.62% | 19.09% | 11.78% | 26.04% | -11.25% |
DRFU.TO Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 15.27% | 12.18% | 37.32% | 5.44% | -9.19% | 29.41% | 7.31% | 21.84% | -8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between COW.TO and DRFU.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
COW.TO
DRFU.TO
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO) and Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COW.TO | DRFU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.61 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 4.25 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 15.34 | -14.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COW.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than DRFU.TO's maximum drawdown of -19.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COW.TO and DRFU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COW.TO | DRFU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.00% | -19.89% | -35.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -6.89% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.51% | -19.89% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.84% | -19.89% | -9.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.46% | 0.00% | -10.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -4.92% | -9.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 1.90% | +3.85% |
Volatility
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF (COW.TO) is 2.31%, while Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFU.TO) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that COW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRFU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COW.TO | DRFU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 2.67% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 11.39% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 13.99% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 16.37% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 16.49% | +5.32% |
Dividends
COW.TO vs. DRFU.TO - Dividend Comparison
COW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than DRFU.TO's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COW.TO iShares Global Agriculture Index ETF | 1.37% | 2.46% | 1.43% | 1.62% | 2.01% | 0.69% | 1.13% | 1.13% | 1.18% | 0.63% | 1.21% | 1.96% |
DRFU.TO Desjardins RI USA Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 1.01% | 0.76% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 1.38% | 1.37% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COW.TO and DRFU.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Desjardins.
Find the right allocation for COW.TO and DRFU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer