PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COVR.DE achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBF.DE's 0.73% return.


COVR.DE

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
0.96%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
0.53%

4UBF.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.23%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COVR.DE
PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.22%2.66%3.80%6.11%-12.85%-1.15%
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.73%3.23%4.51%8.22%-15.67%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between COVR.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2021

0.76

The correlation between COVR.DE and 4UBF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COVR.DE
COVR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
COVR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
COVR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COVR.DE4UBF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.10

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

0.69

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

2.30

-1.65

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COVR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the 4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COVR.DE and 4UBF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COVR.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.55

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

-0.04

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.04

+0.25

Drawdowns

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum 4UBF.DE drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COVR.DE and 4UBF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COVR.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-19.99%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-2.88%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.85%

-2.88%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.69%

-19.99%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-2.81%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-8.54%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.87%

+0.13%

Volatility

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE) is 0.92%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that COVR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COVR.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.25%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

3.11%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

3.67%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

5.08%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.98%

5.02%

-2.04%

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COVR.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

COVR.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison

COVR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while 4UBF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4UBF.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COVR.DE
PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist
2.49%2.43%1.66%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.42%1.20%0.78%0.57%0.74%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


COVR.DE and 4UBF.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBF.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for COVR.DE.

COVR.DE tracks PIMCO Covered Bond, while 4UBF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for COVR.DE and 0.13% for 4UBF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COVR.DE and 4UBF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer