PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSNX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Overseas Core Fund (COSNX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSNX achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 3.65% return.


COSNX

1D
-6.78%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*

GSIMX

1D
0.22%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
3.65%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.87%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
COSNX
Columbia Overseas Core Fund
0.08%38.31%3.42%15.51%-14.92%9.60%8.65%25.39%-17.16%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
3.65%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between COSNX and GSIMX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between COSNX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSNX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSNX
COSNX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
COSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
COSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Overseas Core Fund (COSNX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSNXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

4.15

+0.65

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSNX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSNX drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSNX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSNXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.68%

-28.84%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-7.81%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.43%

-10.32%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-25.37%

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-6.24%

-3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-4.81%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.53%

+0.84%

Volatility

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Overseas Core Fund (COSNX) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.83%. This indicates that COSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSNXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.48%

2.83%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

8.21%

+6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.44%

9.89%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

14.37%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

15.67%

+1.87%

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSNX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSNX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

COSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than GSIMX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
COSNX
Columbia Overseas Core Fund
9.45%9.55%4.25%4.59%1.46%8.15%2.25%3.80%1.16%0.00%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.94%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSNX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COSNX has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to GSIMX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSNX dropped -36.68% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSNX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer