CORP.L vs. XCOU.L
CORP.L (iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XCOU.L (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both Global Corporate Bonds funds - CORP.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (USD) while XCOU.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CORP.L returned 5.03%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for XCOU.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CORP.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XCOU.L.
Performance
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORP.L achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than XCOU.L's 0.96% return.
CORP.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
XCOU.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORP.L iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -0.49% | 9.82% | 1.37% | 8.71% | -3.04% |
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.96% | 5.28% | 4.41% | 8.47% | -4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORP.L and XCOU.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CORP.L and XCOU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CORP.L
XCOU.L
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) and Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORP.L | XCOU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.23 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.35 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 4.31 | -1.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, which is greater than XCOU.L's maximum drawdown of -7.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORP.L and XCOU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORP.L | XCOU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.09% | -7.95% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.55% | -2.46% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.07% | -2.46% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.77% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -1.52% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 0.77% | +0.52% |
Volatility
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (XCOU.L) at 0.75%. This indicates that CORP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCOU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORP.L | XCOU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.75% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.85% | 2.28% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.91% | 2.66% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.98% | 4.06% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.72% | 4.06% | +2.66% |
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XCOU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CORP.L vs. XCOU.L - Dividend Comparison
CORP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while XCOU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORP.L iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.27% | 4.05% | 3.98% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.13% | 2.28% | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.48% | 2.73% | 2.68% |
XCOU.L Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10Y UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORP.L and XCOU.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCOU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCOU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CORP.L.
CORP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (USD), while XCOU.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CORP.L and 0.15% for XCOU.L.
Find the right allocation for CORP.L and XCOU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer