CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX
CORE.AX (Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF) and ROBO.AX (Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CORE.AX is actively managed, while ROBO.AX is passively managed. Over the past year, CORE.AX returned 14.00% vs 19.38% for ROBO.AX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORE.AX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than ROBO.AX's 6.70% return.
CORE.AX
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO.AX
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- —
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 3.61% | 12.78% |
ROBO.AX Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF | 6.70% | 20.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORE.AX and ROBO.AX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.50 |
The correlation between CORE.AX and ROBO.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX — Risk / Return Rank
CORE.AX
ROBO.AX
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) and Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORE.AX | ROBO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.40 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 4.19 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORE.AX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum ROBO.AX drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORE.AX and ROBO.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORE.AX | ROBO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -34.87% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -13.46% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -12.61% | +10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -9.97% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.56% | — |
Volatility
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) is 2.49%, while Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF (ROBO.AX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that CORE.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORE.AX | ROBO.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 8.62% | -6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.50% | 19.30% | -11.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.51% | 22.65% | -10.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 20.09% | -7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 19.79% | -7.24% |
Dividends
CORE.AX vs. ROBO.AX - Dividend Comparison
CORE.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than ROBO.AX's 10.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 0.69% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO.AX Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF | 10.74% | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.53% | 8.00% | 8.53% | 0.62% | 0.31% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORE.AX and ROBO.AX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Schroder and Global X.
Find the right allocation for CORE.AX and ROBO.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer