CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX
CORE.AX (Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF) and ILB.AX (iShares Government Inflation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CORE.AX is actively managed, while ILB.AX is passively managed. Over the past year, CORE.AX returned 15.14% vs 3.25% for ILB.AX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORE.AX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than ILB.AX's 1.76% return.
CORE.AX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILB.AX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 4.95% | 12.78% |
ILB.AX iShares Government Inflation ETF | 1.76% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORE.AX and ILB.AX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX — Risk / Return Rank
CORE.AX
ILB.AX
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) and iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORE.AX | ILB.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.68 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | 1.57 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORE.AX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum ILB.AX drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORE.AX and ILB.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORE.AX | ILB.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -17.45% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -4.40% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -0.93% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -3.59% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX - Volatility Comparison
Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to iShares Government Inflation ETF (ILB.AX) at 0.81%. This indicates that CORE.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILB.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORE.AX | ILB.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 0.81% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.39% | 3.51% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 5.05% | +7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 7.38% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 7.33% | +5.17% |
Dividends
CORE.AX vs. ILB.AX - Dividend Comparison
CORE.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than ILB.AX's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILB.AX iShares Government Inflation ETF | 1.64% | 1.56% | 1.65% | 1.56% | 0.85% | 0.53% | 0.83% | 1.40% | 0.74% | 0.70% | 1.22% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORE.AX and ILB.AX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Schroder and iShares.
Find the right allocation for CORE.AX and ILB.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer