CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX
CORE.AX (Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF) and IFRA.AX (VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CORE.AX is actively managed, while IFRA.AX is passively managed. Over the past year, CORE.AX returned 15.14% vs 16.33% for IFRA.AX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORE.AX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA.AX's 10.62% return.
CORE.AX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFRA.AX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 16.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 4.95% | 12.78% |
IFRA.AX VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 10.62% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORE.AX and IFRA.AX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX — Risk / Return Rank
CORE.AX
IFRA.AX
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) and VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORE.AX | IFRA.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.99 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | 7.68 | -3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORE.AX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum IFRA.AX drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORE.AX and IFRA.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORE.AX | IFRA.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -36.36% | +26.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -5.54% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.65% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -6.01% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) is 2.12%, while VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that CORE.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFRA.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORE.AX | IFRA.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 3.82% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.39% | 9.13% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 10.95% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 14.30% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 15.06% | -2.56% |
Dividends
CORE.AX vs. IFRA.AX - Dividend Comparison
CORE.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than IFRA.AX's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFRA.AX VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 2.23% | 3.15% | 1.61% | 2.51% | 2.31% | 2.93% | 3.58% | 3.29% | 2.91% | 2.11% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORE.AX and IFRA.AX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Schroder and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for CORE.AX and IFRA.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer