PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) and Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF
2.05%66.80%15.35%11.74%-4.85%
HURA.TO
Global X Uranium Index ETF
11.72%43.18%3.05%61.03%3.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPP.TO achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than HURA.TO's 11.72% return.


COPP.TO

1D
8.08%
1M
-18.57%
YTD
2.05%
6M
21.76%
1Y
74.15%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
10Y*

HURA.TO

1D
4.70%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
11.72%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
107.11%
3Y*
37.96%
5Y*
27.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPP.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than HURA.TO's 0.98% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPP.TO
COPP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
COPP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

HURA.TO
HURA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HURA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) and Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPP.TOHURA.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.25

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.86

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.41

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.39

8.02

+1.37

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the HURA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPP.TO and HURA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPP.TOHURA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.25

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.77

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between COPP.TO and HURA.TO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Dividend Comparison

COPP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than HURA.TO's 0.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF
0.17%0.18%0.19%0.73%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HURA.TO
Global X Uranium Index ETF
0.08%0.09%0.75%1.03%1.46%1.26%0.63%0.82%

Drawdowns

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPP.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum HURA.TO drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP.TO and HURA.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COPP.TOHURA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.80%

-43.51%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.09%

-30.61%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.69%

-22.39%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-14.35%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

13.03%

-5.61%

Volatility

COPP.TO vs. HURA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.91% compared to Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) at 13.09%. This indicates that COPP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HURA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COPP.TOHURA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.91%

13.09%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.73%

37.50%

-5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.64%

47.83%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.95%

39.88%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.95%

38.67%

-0.72%