COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE
COPP.L (Sprott Pure Play Copper Miners UCITS ETF) and QDVE.DE (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPP.L is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while QDVE.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COPP.L returned 85.98% vs 30.50% for QDVE.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPP.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVE.DE.
Performance
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COPP.L is traded in GBP, while QDVE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVE.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPP.L achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 16.48% return.
COPP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.98%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 85.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVE.DE
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- 18.47%
- YTD
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 27.96%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 25.23%
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COPP.L Sprott Pure Play Copper Miners UCITS ETF | 8.21% | 90.17% | 10.61% | 8,974.24% |
QDVE.DE iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 16.48% | 15.73% | 39.72% | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPP.L and QDVE.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
COPP.L
QDVE.DE
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Pure Play Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPP.L | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.85 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 4.47 | +2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPP.L drawdown since its inception was -36.29%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP.L and QDVE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPP.L | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.29% | -28.27% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.75% | -16.44% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.37% | -8.08% | -6.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.30% | -5.21% | -7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.28% | 6.80% | +5.48% |
Volatility
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Pure Play Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPP.L) has a higher volatility of 12.59% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) at 7.24%. This indicates that COPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPP.L | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.59% | 7.24% | +5.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.85% | 16.39% | +20.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.33% | 21.59% | +37.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4,855.84% | 22.52% | +4,833.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4,855.84% | 21.63% | +4,834.21% |
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPP.L vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPP.L nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPP.L and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPP.L.
COPP.L is categorized as Copper, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. COPP.L tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPP.L and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.
Find the right allocation for COPP.L and QDVE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer