COPJ vs. NRJL.L

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) and NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - COPJ is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COPJ returned 38.25%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for NRJL.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPJ charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NRJL.L.

Performance

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

COPJ is traded in USD, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 36.22% return.

COPJ

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: -11.17%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: -0.15%
• 1Y: 82.49%
• 3Y*: 38.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRJL.L

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: 36.22%
• 6M: 35.32%
• 1Y: 72.67%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: 2.12%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	0.79%	140.63%	11.07%	-6.47%
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	36.22%	45.70%	-13.04%	-25.99%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and NRJL.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.51

The correlation between COPJ and NRJL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COPJ	NRJL.L
Basic Materials	100.0%	10.8%
Technology	3.6%	16.7%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	4.1%
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	39.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	32.9%

Return for Risk

COPJ vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 57
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

NRJL.L

NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPJ	NRJL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	3.26	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.89	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.53	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	6.92	-4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.71	22.97	-16.25

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and NRJL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum NRJL.L drawdown of -57.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and NRJL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPJ	NRJL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-57.04%	+24.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.28%	-10.45%	-21.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.28%	-39.74%	+7.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.96%	-3.29%	-19.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.08%	-28.42%	+16.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.33%	3.15%	+9.18%

Volatility

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a higher volatility of 18.91% compared to Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) at 9.76%. This indicates that COPJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPJ	NRJL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.91%	9.76%	+9.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.69%	18.71%	+19.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.95%	22.20%	+22.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.66%	24.34%	+11.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.66%	23.74%	+11.92%

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NRJL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPJ vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, more than NRJL.L's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	11.48%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.30%	0.42%	0.73%	0.77%	0.24%	0.32%	0.70%	1.02%	0.59%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPJ and NRJL.L in my portfolio?

COPJ and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COPJ or NRJL.L?

On fees, NRJL.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPJ or NRJL.L?

NRJL.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

What is the main difference between COPJ and NRJL.L?

COPJ is categorized as Copper, while NRJL.L is Energy Equities. COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.60% for NRJL.L.