COPJ vs. NFLP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) and NFLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPJ is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while NFLP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. COPJ is passively managed, while NFLP is actively managed. Over the past year, COPJ returned 91.57% vs -46.09% for NFLP. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPJ charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NFLP.

Performance

COPJ vs. NFLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than NFLP's -28.63% return.

COPJ

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 91.57%
• 3Y*: 41.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFLP

• 1D: -6.68%
• 1M: -20.17%
• YTD: -28.63%
• 6M: -28.08%
• 1Y: -46.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. NFLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	5.68%	140.63%	11.07%	15.76%
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF	-28.63%	-1.54%	53.24%	13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and NFLP is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.19

The correlation between COPJ and NFLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COPJ vs. NFLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ

COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 56
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

NFLP

NFLP Risk / Return Rank: 0
NFLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NFLP Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLP Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. NFLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPJ	NFLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	-1.35	+3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	-2.11	+4.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.73	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	-0.94	+3.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	-1.75	+9.59

COPJ vs. NFLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the NFLP Sharpe Ratio of -1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and NFLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. NFLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum NFLP drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and NFLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPJ	NFLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-49.06%	+16.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.28%	-49.06%	+16.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.22%	-49.06%	+29.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-10.33%	-1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.74%	26.29%	-14.55%

Volatility

COPJ vs. NFLP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a higher volatility of 18.92% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF (NFLP) at 9.07%. This indicates that COPJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPJ	NFLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.92%	9.07%	+9.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.53%	27.84%	+10.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.93%	34.30%	+10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.58%	29.09%	+6.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.58%	29.09%	+6.49%

COPJ vs. NFLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLP's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPJ vs. NFLP - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, less than NFLP's 29.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF	10.95%	11.57%	11.64%	2.48%
NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix ETF	29.72%	26.56%	19.87%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPJ and NFLP in my portfolio?

COPJ and NFLP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPJ or NFLP?

COPJ has higher volatility (18.92%) compared to NFLP (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs NFLP's -49.06%.

Which ETF is better, COPJ or NFLP?

On 1-year performance, COPJ leads with 91.57% vs -46.09% for NFLP. On fees, COPJ is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, NFLP has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPJ or NFLP?

Over the 1-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 91.57% return vs -46.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPJ or NFLP?

COPJ is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPJ or NFLP?

NFLP has the higher dividend yield at 29.72%, compared with 10.95% for COPJ.

What is the main difference between COPJ and NFLP?

COPJ is categorized as Copper, while NFLP is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.99% for NFLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.