COPJ vs. NANR
COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) and NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - COPJ tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index while NANR tracks the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COPJ returned 47.64%/yr vs 21.02%/yr for NANR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPJ charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NANR.
Performance
COPJ vs. NANR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly lower than NANR's 24.74% return.
COPJ
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- 15.54%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 40.03%
- 1Y
- 137.28%
- 3Y*
- 47.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NANR
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.76%
- 1Y
- 55.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.02%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
COPJ vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | 20.64% | 140.63% | 11.07% | -5.30% |
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 24.74% | 35.35% | 2.31% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPJ and NANR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between COPJ and NANR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
COPJ vs. NANR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPJ
NANR
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
COPJ
NANR
Technology
COPJ
NANR
Communication Services
COPJ
-
NANR
-
Consumer Cyclical
COPJ
-
NANR
Consumer Defensive
COPJ
-
NANR
Energy
COPJ
-
NANR
Financial Services
COPJ
-
NANR
-
Healthcare
COPJ
-
NANR
-
Industrials
COPJ
-
NANR
Real Estate
COPJ
-
NANR
Utilities
COPJ
-
NANR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPJ vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank
COPJ
NANR
COPJ vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPJ | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.30 | 3.09 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.38 | 3.82 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.51 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 6.64 | -2.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.85 | 23.52 | -10.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPJ | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 3.09 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.63 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
COPJ vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum NANR drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and NANR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPJ | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -49.15% | +16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.28% | -8.93% | -23.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.28% | -18.42% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.78% | -1.82% | -5.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.86% | -8.40% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.00% | 2.52% | +8.48% |
Volatility
COPJ vs. NANR - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) at 4.89%. This indicates that COPJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPJ | NANR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.94% | 4.89% | +10.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.86% | 14.36% | +20.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.90% | 18.25% | +23.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.71% | 22.89% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.71% | 23.54% | +11.17% |
COPJ vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NANR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPJ vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison
COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than NANR's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | 9.59% | 11.57% | 11.64% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.83% | 5.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPJ and NANR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPJ has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to NANR (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs NANR's -49.15%.
On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 47.64% vs 21.02% for NANR. On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NANR has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 47.64% return vs 21.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.
COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 1.68% for NANR.
COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.35% for NANR.
COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPJ and NANR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer