PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPA.L vs. DGRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPA.L achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 6.76% return.


COPA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
9.03%
YTD
13.93%
6M
21.07%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
10.33%

DGRA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
3.51%
YTD
6.76%
6M
6.13%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
13.93%36.37%4.81%2.66%-13.58%24.36%21.41%4.90%-20.37%26.83%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
6.76%13.09%18.23%18.70%-8.32%25.27%12.58%28.83%-6.56%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between COPA.L and DGRA.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPA.L
COPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPA.LDGRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.63

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

10.40

-7.83

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPA.L and DGRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPA.LDGRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.84

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.83

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.91

-0.83

Drawdowns

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPA.L drawdown since its inception was -67.44%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -31.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPA.L and DGRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPA.LDGRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.44%

-31.66%

-35.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.25%

-7.54%

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.25%

-16.17%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

-17.94%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.04%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.24%

-3.54%

-29.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.73%

1.91%

+9.82%

Volatility

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 2.43%. This indicates that COPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPA.LDGRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

2.43%

+6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

7.67%

+11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.17%

10.75%

+22.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.20%

14.10%

+12.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

14.92%

+8.36%

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPA.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPA.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COPA.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COPA.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRA.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COPA.L.

COPA.L is categorized as Metals, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COPA.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPA.L and DGRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer