COOP vs. CSW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

COOP (Mr. Cooper Group Inc.) and CSW (CSW Industrials Inc) are both stocks. COOP operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services), while CSW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COOP vs. CSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mr. Cooper Group Inc. (COOP) and CSW Industrials Inc (CSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COOP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSW

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: -7.13%
• 6M: -14.57%
• 1Y: -8.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COOP vs. CSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COOP Mr. Cooper Group Inc.	0.00%	62.09%
CSW CSW Industrials Inc	-7.13%	-4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between COOP and CSW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap COOP : $13.72B CSW : $4.55B
EPS COOP : $8.76 CSW : $6.68
PE Ratio COOP : 24.07 CSW : 40.71
PEG Ratio COOP : 0.24 CSW : 2.65
PS Ratio COOP : 6.00 CSW : 4.21
PB Ratio COOP : 2.69 CSW : 4.33
Total Revenue (TTM) COOP : $2.29B CSW : $1.08B
Gross Profit (TTM) COOP : $1.68B CSW : $453.68M
EBITDA (TTM) COOP : $852.00M CSW : $211.08M

Return for Risk

COOP vs. CSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSW

CSW Risk / Return Rank: 32
CSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CSW Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CSW Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COOP vs. CSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mr. Cooper Group Inc. (COOP) and CSW Industrials Inc (CSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COOP	CSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.00	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.54	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	COOP	CSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-25.35%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-18.67%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.86%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COOP	CSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	40.46%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	40.37%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	40.37%	—

Dividends

COOP vs. CSW - Dividend Comparison

COOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

Position	TTM	2025
COOP Mr. Cooper Group Inc.	0.95%	0.95%
CSW CSW Industrials Inc	0.41%	0.18%

Financials

COOP vs. CSW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mr. Cooper Group Inc. and CSW Industrials Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

COOP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mr. Cooper Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 417.00M and revenue of 608.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.6%.

CSW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 308.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.

COOP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mr. Cooper Group Inc. reported an operating income of 293.00M and revenue of 608.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.2%.

CSW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported an operating income of 37.44M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

COOP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mr. Cooper Group Inc. reported a net income of 198.00M and revenue of 608.00M, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.

CSW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COOP and CSW in my portfolio?

COOP and CSW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.