PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONWX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
8.18%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%7.17%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
9.34%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONWX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CONWX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 8.62%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.


CONWX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
8.18%
6M
11.51%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.62%

SIFAX

1D
0.46%
1M
2.61%
YTD
9.34%
6M
11.23%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONWX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONWX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CONWX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CONWXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.19

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.07

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.74

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.30

9.56

+1.73

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONWX and SIFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CONWXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.19

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

1.27

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.77

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.36

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CONWX and SIFAX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

CONWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than SIFAX's 4.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.41%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%0.00%0.00%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.16%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%

Drawdowns

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONWX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONWX and SIFAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CONWXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-23.62%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-3.07%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.49%

-8.32%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.09%

-14.69%

-11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

0.00%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-8.65%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.25%

+0.27%

Volatility

CONWX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CONWXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.03%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.43%

3.91%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

5.30%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.26%

5.50%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.15%

5.16%

+5.99%