PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMM.L vs. WOSC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) and SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COMM.L is traded in GBp, while WOSC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WOSC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMM.L achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than WOSC.L's 13.56% return.


COMM.L

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
26.50%
6M
24.77%
1Y
40.42%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*

WOSC.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
4.77%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.73%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
26.50%8.53%6.19%-12.55%28.34%29.04%-7.09%2.79%-4.51%0.62%
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
13.56%11.76%9.41%9.96%-8.76%16.26%12.23%22.09%-9.72%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between COMM.L and WOSC.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017

0.23

The correlation between COMM.L and WOSC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COMM.L
WOSC.L

Basic Materials

35.8%
8.2%

Financial Services

17.8%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
10.9%

Communication Services

12.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
4.2%

Real Estate

5.8%
8.2%

Technology

5.6%
13.4%

Energy

-

5.6%

Healthcare

-

9.5%

Industrials

-

20.5%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Basic Materials

COMM.L
35.8%
WOSC.L
8.2%

Financial Services

COMM.L
17.8%
WOSC.L
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

COMM.L
12.9%
WOSC.L
10.9%

Communication Services

COMM.L
12.3%
WOSC.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

COMM.L
9.7%
WOSC.L
4.2%

Real Estate

COMM.L
5.8%
WOSC.L
8.2%

Technology

COMM.L
5.6%
WOSC.L
13.4%

Energy

COMM.L

-

WOSC.L
5.6%

Healthcare

COMM.L

-

WOSC.L
9.5%

Industrials

COMM.L

-

WOSC.L
20.5%

Utilities

COMM.L

-

WOSC.L
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMM.L
COMM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COMM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
COMM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) and SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMM.LWOSC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

4.19

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

16.10

-3.83

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMM.L and WOSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMM.LWOSC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.58

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.50

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.54

-0.01

Drawdowns

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, smaller than the maximum WOSC.L drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMM.L and WOSC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMM.LWOSC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-36.13%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-7.83%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-21.43%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.49%

-21.43%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-0.42%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-5.45%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

2.04%

+1.24%

Volatility

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that COMM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WOSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMM.LWOSC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

3.56%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

9.29%

+7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

12.76%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

15.69%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

20.88%

-5.51%

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMM.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than WOSC.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMM.L vs. WOSC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMM.L nor WOSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COMM.L and WOSC.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.

COMM.L is categorized as Commodities, while WOSC.L is Global Equities. COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMM.L and 0.45% for WOSC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMM.L and WOSC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer