PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COMM.L is traded in GBp, while IWQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMM.L achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than IWQU.L's 7.83% return.


COMM.L

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
26.50%
6M
24.77%
1Y
40.42%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*

IWQU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
3.08%
YTD
7.83%
6M
8.28%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
13.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COMM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
26.50%8.53%6.19%-12.55%28.34%29.04%-7.09%2.79%-4.51%0.62%
IWQU.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
7.96%7.07%19.43%19.38%-9.66%24.87%11.57%24.71%-2.05%4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between COMM.L and IWQU.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017

0.19

The correlation between COMM.L and IWQU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COMM.L
IWQU.L

Basic Materials

35.8%
3.2%

Financial Services

17.8%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
8.9%

Communication Services

12.3%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
5.1%

Real Estate

5.8%
1.7%

Technology

5.6%
31.6%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

9.4%

Industrials

-

10.6%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Basic Materials

COMM.L
35.8%
IWQU.L
3.2%

Financial Services

COMM.L
17.8%
IWQU.L
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

COMM.L
12.9%
IWQU.L
8.9%

Communication Services

COMM.L
12.3%
IWQU.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

COMM.L
9.7%
IWQU.L
5.1%

Real Estate

COMM.L
5.8%
IWQU.L
1.7%

Technology

COMM.L
5.6%
IWQU.L
31.6%

Energy

COMM.L

-

IWQU.L
4.2%

Healthcare

COMM.L

-

IWQU.L
9.4%

Industrials

COMM.L

-

IWQU.L
10.6%

Utilities

COMM.L

-

IWQU.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMM.L
COMM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COMM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
COMM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IWQU.L
IWQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMM.LIWQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

3.23

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

12.76

-0.48

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMM.L and IWQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMM.LIWQU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.95

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.79

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.92

-0.40

Drawdowns

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than IWQU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMM.L and IWQU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COMM.LIWQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-24.70%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-6.67%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-18.12%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.49%

-18.12%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-0.49%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-3.60%

-8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

1.69%

+1.59%

Volatility

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that COMM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COMM.LIWQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

3.31%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

8.45%

+7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

11.10%

+7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

14.26%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

15.44%

-0.07%

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMM.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMM.L nor IWQU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COMM.L and IWQU.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COMM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COMM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWQU.L.

COMM.L is categorized as Commodities, while IWQU.L is Global Equities. COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while IWQU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMM.L and 0.30% for IWQU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COMM.L and IWQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer