COMM.L vs. IWQU.L
COMM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) and IWQU.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - COMM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while IWQU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COMM.L returned 12.56%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for IWQU.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COMM.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWQU.L.
Performance
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COMM.L is traded in GBp, while IWQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMM.L achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than IWQU.L's 7.83% return.
COMM.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 6M
- 24.77%
- 1Y
- 40.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
IWQU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 8.28%
- 1Y
- 21.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 26.50% | 8.53% | 6.19% | -12.55% | 28.34% | 29.04% | -7.09% | 2.79% | -4.51% | 0.62% |
IWQU.L iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS | 7.96% | 7.07% | 19.43% | 19.38% | -9.66% | 24.87% | 11.57% | 24.71% | -2.05% | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMM.L and IWQU.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between COMM.L and IWQU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Financial Services
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Consumer Cyclical
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Communication Services
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Consumer Defensive
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Real Estate
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Technology
COMM.L
IWQU.L
Energy
COMM.L
-
IWQU.L
Healthcare
COMM.L
-
IWQU.L
Industrials
COMM.L
-
IWQU.L
Utilities
COMM.L
-
IWQU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L — Risk / Return Rank
COMM.L
IWQU.L
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COMM.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 3.23 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 12.76 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COMM.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.95 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.92 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than IWQU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMM.L and IWQU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMM.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.49% | -24.70% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -6.67% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.73% | -18.12% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.49% | -18.12% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -0.49% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -3.60% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 1.69% | +1.59% |
Volatility
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that COMM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMM.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 3.31% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 8.45% | +7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 11.10% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 14.26% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 15.44% | -0.07% |
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMM.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IWQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMM.L vs. IWQU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COMM.L nor IWQU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COMM.L and IWQU.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWQU.L.
COMM.L is categorized as Commodities, while IWQU.L is Global Equities. COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while IWQU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for COMM.L and 0.30% for IWQU.L.
Find the right allocation for COMM.L and IWQU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer