COMF.L vs. DEL2.L
COMF.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) and DEL2.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - COMF.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while DEL2.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COMF.L returned 8.22%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for DEL2.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COMF.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DEL2.L.
Performance
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COMF.L is traded in USD, while DEL2.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DEL2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMF.L achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly higher than DEL2.L's -2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, COMF.L has underperformed DEL2.L with an annualized return of 8.22%, while DEL2.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.
COMF.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- YTD
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
DEL2.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 1Y
- -1.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMF.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 15.66% | 16.43% | 5.13% | -6.37% | 18.73% | 32.96% | 2.52% | 7.36% | -8.43% | 3.10% |
DEL2.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -2.76% | 55.69% | 23.51% | 38.94% | -32.05% | 21.17% | 4.49% | 43.28% | -38.64% | 45.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMF.L and DEL2.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2010 | 0.29 |
The correlation between COMF.L and DEL2.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L — Risk / Return Rank
COMF.L
DEL2.L
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COMF.L | DEL2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.02 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | -0.07 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | -0.21 | +6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMF.L drawdown since its inception was -60.21%, smaller than the maximum DEL2.L drawdown of -68.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMF.L and DEL2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMF.L | DEL2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.21% | -68.93% | +8.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -27.05% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.25% | -29.73% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.56% | -56.47% | +33.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.69% | -68.93% | +39.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -8.94% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.36% | -18.99% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 8.86% | -5.09% |
Volatility
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) is 3.91%, while L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that COMF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEL2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMF.L | DEL2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 9.63% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 28.89% | -17.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 33.93% | -20.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 36.96% | -22.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 37.64% | -24.36% |
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMF.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DEL2.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMF.L vs. DEL2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COMF.L nor DEL2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COMF.L and DEL2.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMF.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMF.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DEL2.L.
COMF.L is categorized as Commodities, while DEL2.L is Leveraged Equities. COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return, while DEL2.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for COMF.L and 0.40% for DEL2.L.
Find the right allocation for COMF.L and DEL2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer