PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COLTX vs. MUC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COLTX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund (COLTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLTX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, COLTX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.98%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.78% annualized return.


COLTX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.04%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.72%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
1.98%

MUC

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.68%
YTD
4.06%
6M
3.70%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
-2.69%
10Y*
0.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COLTX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COLTX
Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund
2.32%3.86%3.47%6.60%-12.56%3.01%3.37%8.15%0.19%6.15%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
4.06%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-9.00%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between COLTX and MUC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1998

0.28

The correlation between COLTX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COLTX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLTX
COLTX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
COLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
COLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLTX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund (COLTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COLTXMUCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.25

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.62

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

6.57

+3.00

COLTX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLTX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COLTXMUCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.31

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.24

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.07

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.29

+0.66

Drawdowns

COLTX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLTX drawdown since its inception was -18.07%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLTX and MUC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COLTXMUCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.07%

-48.97%

+30.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-6.53%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.08%

-14.51%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-38.29%

+20.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.07%

-38.29%

+20.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.50%

+16.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-9.90%

+7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.60%

-0.70%

Volatility

COLTX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund (COLTX) is 1.38%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that COLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COLTXMUCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.37%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

6.24%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60%

8.05%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.24%

11.50%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

11.89%

-6.91%

COLTX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

COLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

COLTX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

COLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than MUC's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLTX
Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund
3.74%4.91%3.66%3.15%3.05%3.20%3.27%4.60%3.80%3.86%4.15%4.13%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.97%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


COLTX and MUC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUC has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to COLTX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLTX dropped -18.07% vs MUC's -48.97%.

COLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COLTX and MUC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer