COIO vs. ZAPR
COIO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF) and ZAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZAPR.
Performance
COIO vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIO achieves a -21.03% return, which is significantly lower than ZAPR's 3.25% return.
COIO
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- YTD
- -21.03%
- 6M
- -36.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAPR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIO vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF | -21.03% | -27.09% |
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 3.25% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIO and ZAPR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIO vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank
COIO
ZAPR
COIO vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF (COIO) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIO | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | 2.96 | -3.73 |
Drawdowns
COIO vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIO drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIO and ZAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIO | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.48% | -1.72% | -60.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.21% | -0.03% | -52.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.44% | -0.09% | -31.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility
COIO vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIO | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.87% | 1.46% | +63.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 2.51% | +62.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 2.51% | +62.36% |
COIO vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIO vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison
COIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.91%, while ZAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COIO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF | 88.91% | 70.21% |
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIO and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAPR.
COIO has the higher dividend yield at 88.91%, compared with 0.00% for ZAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for COIO and 0.79% for ZAPR.
Find the right allocation for COIO and ZAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer