COIO vs. APXM
COIO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.
Performance
COIO vs. APXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIO achieves a -21.03% return, which is significantly lower than APXM's 2.11% return.
COIO
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- YTD
- -21.03%
- 6M
- -36.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APXM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIO vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF | -21.03% | -27.09% |
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April | 2.11% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIO and APXM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIO vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank
COIO
APXM
COIO vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF (COIO) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIO | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | 5.70 | -6.47 |
Drawdowns
COIO vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIO drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIO and APXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIO | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.48% | -0.40% | -62.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.21% | -0.06% | -52.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.44% | -0.03% | -31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
COIO vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIO | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.87% | 1.01% | +63.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 1.20% | +63.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 1.20% | +63.67% |
COIO vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIO vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison
COIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.91%, while APXM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COIO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated COIN Monthly ETF | 88.91% | 70.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIO and APXM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COIO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.
COIO has the higher dividend yield at 88.91%, compared with 0.00% for APXM.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for COIO and 0.85% for APXM.
Find the right allocation for COIO and APXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer