COHR vs. INBX
COHR (Coherent, Inc.) and INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) are both stocks. COHR operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, COHR returned 404.05% vs 540.30% for INBX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COHR vs. INBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COHR achieves a 117.77% return, which is significantly higher than INBX's 12.82% return.
COHR
- 1D
- 6.62%
- 1M
- 19.89%
- YTD
- 117.77%
- 6M
- 116.25%
- 1Y
- 404.05%
- 3Y*
- 117.79%
- 5Y*
- 41.61%
- 10Y*
- 35.09%
INBX
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -33.66%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- -4.68%
- 1Y
- 540.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COHR vs. INBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COHR Coherent, Inc. | 117.77% | 94.84% | 63.27% |
INBX Inhibrx, Inc. | 12.82% | 412.99% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between COHR and INBX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
COHR:
$1.64K
INBX:
-$8.40
COHR:
0.03
INBX:
1.06K
COHR:
$1.81T
INBX:
$1.30M
COHR:
$1.76B
INBX:
-$508.00K
COHR:
$960.76M
INBX:
-$117.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COHR vs. INBX — Risk / Return Rank
COHR
INBX
COHR vs. INBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COHR | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.67 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.36 | 14.10 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.88 | 36.07 | +6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COHR | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.62 | 4.21 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.51 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
COHR vs. INBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COHR drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than INBX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHR and INBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COHR | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.89% | -39.84% | -41.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.52% | -38.66% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -37.16% | +31.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -16.96% | -18.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.48% | 15.08% | -5.60% |
Volatility
COHR vs. INBX - Volatility Comparison
Coherent, Inc. (COHR) has a higher volatility of 28.41% compared to Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) at 26.07%. This indicates that COHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COHR | INBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.41% | 26.07% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.90% | 62.17% | -6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.65% | 129.72% | -57.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.36% | 100.66% | -39.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.43% | 100.66% | -44.23% |
Dividends
COHR vs. INBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither COHR nor INBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
COHR vs. INBX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coherent, Inc. and Inhibrx, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
COHR and INBX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COHR has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to INBX (26.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COHR dropped -80.89% vs INBX's -39.84%.
COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 4.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COHR and INBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer