PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COFF.L vs. UGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COFF.L vs. UGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFF.L achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly lower than UGL's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, COFF.L has underperformed UGL with an annualized return of 5.38%, while UGL has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.


COFF.L

1D
-1.31%
1M
-9.77%
YTD
-24.02%
6M
-28.50%
1Y
-13.30%
3Y*
26.18%
5Y*
18.19%
10Y*
5.38%

UGL

1D
-2.00%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
1.78%
1Y
51.67%
3Y*
53.18%
5Y*
27.00%
10Y*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFF.L vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COFF.L
WisdomTree Coffee
-24.02%29.87%74.91%24.52%-20.98%63.12%-12.25%13.69%-27.12%-17.66%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-2.16%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%

Correlation

The correlation between COFF.L and UGL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008

0.13

The correlation between COFF.L and UGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COFF.L vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFF.L
COFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
COFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
COFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFF.L vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COFF.LUGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.21

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

1.38

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

3.17

-3.94

COFF.L vs. UGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the UGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFF.L and UGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COFF.LUGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

0.98

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.75

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.57

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.39

-0.43

Drawdowns

COFF.L vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFF.L drawdown since its inception was -88.11%, which is greater than UGL's maximum drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFF.L and UGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COFF.LUGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.11%

-75.93%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.06%

-37.56%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.06%

-37.56%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

-40.23%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.13%

-46.23%

-17.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.09%

-36.56%

-21.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-43.63%

-15.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.22%

16.35%

+0.87%

Volatility

COFF.L vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) is 9.66%, while ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that COFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COFF.LUGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

11.03%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.08%

46.81%

-24.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.44%

52.91%

-18.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.93%

36.18%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

32.34%

-0.83%

COFF.L vs. UGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

COFF.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than UGL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

COFF.L vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison

Neither COFF.L nor UGL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COFF.L and UGL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COFF.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COFF.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UGL.

COFF.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while UGL is Leveraged Commodities. COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee, while UGL tracks Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COFF.L and 0.95% for UGL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COFF.L and UGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer