COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L
COFF.L (WisdomTree Coffee) and QQQ3.L (WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged) are both exchange-traded funds - COFF.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Coffee, while QQQ3.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COFF.L returned 4.55%/yr vs 43.93%/yr for QQQ3.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COFF.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QQQ3.L.
Performance
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COFF.L achieves a -26.25% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ3.L's 56.06% return. Over the past 10 years, COFF.L has underperformed QQQ3.L with an annualized return of 4.55%, while QQQ3.L has yielded a comparatively higher 43.93% annualized return.
COFF.L
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -15.62%
- YTD
- -26.25%
- 6M
- -31.38%
- 1Y
- -17.13%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
QQQ3.L
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 25.62%
- YTD
- 56.06%
- 6M
- 51.95%
- 1Y
- 124.35%
- 3Y*
- 64.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.93%
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COFF.L WisdomTree Coffee | -26.25% | 29.87% | 74.91% | 24.52% | -20.98% | 63.12% | -12.25% | 13.69% | -27.12% | -17.66% |
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | 56.06% | 27.64% | 59.91% | 209.50% | -79.58% | 87.37% | 110.13% | 128.92% | -21.29% | 114.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between COFF.L and QQQ3.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2012 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank
COFF.L
QQQ3.L
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COFF.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.38 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 3.44 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 10.78 | -11.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COFF.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 | 2.63 | -3.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.73 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.82 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COFF.L drawdown since its inception was -88.11%, which is greater than QQQ3.L's maximum drawdown of -81.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFF.L and QQQ3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COFF.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.11% | -81.35% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.03% | -35.92% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.03% | -58.20% | +23.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.94% | -81.35% | +39.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.13% | -81.35% | +17.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.32% | -2.48% | -56.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -19.62% | -39.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.36% | 11.49% | +5.87% |
Volatility
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) is 8.89%, while WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a volatility of 14.73%. This indicates that COFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COFF.L | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 14.73% | -5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.24% | 34.78% | -12.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.56% | 47.01% | -12.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 62.24% | -27.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 59.91% | -28.39% |
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COFF.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
COFF.L vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COFF.L nor QQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COFF.L and QQQ3.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COFF.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COFF.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.
COFF.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while QQQ3.L is Nasdaq-100. COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee, while QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COFF.L and 0.75% for QQQ3.L.
Find the right allocation for COFF.L and QQQ3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer