PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COFF.L is traded in USD, while 3BAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COFF.L achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly lower than 3BAL.L's 2.92% return.


COFF.L

1D
-1.31%
1M
-9.77%
YTD
-24.02%
6M
-28.50%
1Y
-13.30%
3Y*
26.18%
5Y*
18.19%
10Y*
5.38%

3BAL.L

1D
2.31%
1M
13.63%
YTD
2.92%
6M
26.91%
1Y
119.98%
3Y*
142.67%
5Y*
58.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COFF.L
WisdomTree Coffee
-24.02%29.87%74.91%24.52%-20.98%63.12%-12.25%13.69%-27.12%-18.92%
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
2.92%473.30%65.27%72.49%-32.93%106.38%-79.28%30.82%-72.61%27.84%

Correlation

The correlation between COFF.L and 3BAL.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2017

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COFF.L
COFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
COFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
COFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
COFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COFF.L3BAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.27

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

2.51

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.77

6.72

-7.49

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COFF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COFF.L and 3BAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COFF.L3BAL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.68

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.11

-0.15

Drawdowns

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COFF.L drawdown since its inception was -88.11%, smaller than the maximum 3BAL.L drawdown of -97.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFF.L and 3BAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COFF.L3BAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.11%

-97.97%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.06%

-46.85%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.06%

-51.40%

+18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.94%

-80.76%

+38.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.09%

-16.51%

-41.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-67.69%

+8.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.22%

17.50%

-0.28%

Volatility

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) is 9.66%, while WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) has a volatility of 18.73%. This indicates that COFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COFF.L3BAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

18.73%

-9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.08%

55.57%

-33.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.44%

70.08%

-35.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.93%

77.26%

-42.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

84.83%

-53.32%

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COFF.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 3BAL.L's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COFF.L nor 3BAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COFF.L and 3BAL.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COFF.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COFF.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

COFF.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while 3BAL.L is Leveraged Equities. COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee, while 3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COFF.L and 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COFF.L and 3BAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer