COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L
COFF.L (WisdomTree Coffee) and 3BAL.L (WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged) are both exchange-traded funds - COFF.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Coffee, while 3BAL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COFF.L returned 18.19%/yr vs 58.39%/yr for 3BAL.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COFF.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for 3BAL.L.
Performance
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COFF.L is traded in USD, while 3BAL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COFF.L achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly lower than 3BAL.L's 2.92% return.
COFF.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- -24.02%
- 6M
- -28.50%
- 1Y
- -13.30%
- 3Y*
- 26.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
3BAL.L
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 26.91%
- 1Y
- 119.98%
- 3Y*
- 142.67%
- 5Y*
- 58.39%
- 10Y*
- —
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COFF.L WisdomTree Coffee | -24.02% | 29.87% | 74.91% | 24.52% | -20.98% | 63.12% | -12.25% | 13.69% | -27.12% | -18.92% |
3BAL.L WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged | 2.92% | 473.30% | 65.27% | 72.49% | -32.93% | 106.38% | -79.28% | 30.82% | -72.61% | 27.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between COFF.L and 3BAL.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2017 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L — Risk / Return Rank
COFF.L
3BAL.L
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COFF.L | 3BAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.51 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 6.72 | -7.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COFF.L | 3BAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | 1.68 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.76 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.11 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COFF.L drawdown since its inception was -88.11%, smaller than the maximum 3BAL.L drawdown of -97.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COFF.L and 3BAL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COFF.L | 3BAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.11% | -97.97% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.06% | -46.85% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.06% | -51.40% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.94% | -80.76% | +38.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.09% | -16.51% | -41.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -67.69% | +8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.22% | 17.50% | -0.28% |
Volatility
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Coffee (COFF.L) is 9.66%, while WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) has a volatility of 18.73%. This indicates that COFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COFF.L | 3BAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 18.73% | -9.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.08% | 55.57% | -33.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.44% | 70.08% | -35.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.93% | 77.26% | -42.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.51% | 84.83% | -53.32% |
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COFF.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than 3BAL.L's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
COFF.L vs. 3BAL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COFF.L nor 3BAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COFF.L and 3BAL.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COFF.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COFF.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.
COFF.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while 3BAL.L is Leveraged Equities. COFF.L tracks Bloomberg Coffee, while 3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COFF.L and 0.89% for 3BAL.L.
Find the right allocation for COFF.L and 3BAL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer