CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO
CNYE.TO (Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and CANY.TO (Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNYE.TO achieves a -30.06% return, which is significantly lower than CANY.TO's 12.33% return.
CNYE.TO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -16.55%
- YTD
- -30.06%
- 6M
- -43.59%
- 1Y
- -44.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANY.TO
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNYE.TO Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -30.06% | -38.06% |
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF | 12.33% | 5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNYE.TO and CANY.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNYE.TO
CANY.TO
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNYE.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNYE.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 1.59 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, which is greater than CANY.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYE.TO and CANY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNYE.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.18% | -8.34% | -63.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.57% | 0.00% | -65.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -2.12% | -31.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.83% | — | — |
Volatility
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNYE.TO | CANY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.13% | 17.45% | +59.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.50% | 17.45% | +65.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.50% | 17.45% | +65.05% |
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CNYE.TO and CANY.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
CNYE.TO vs. CANY.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.78%, more than CANY.TO's 13.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF | 13.81% | 5.87% |
CNYE.TO Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 89.78% | 48.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNYE.TO and CANY.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNYE.TO and CANY.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Evolve.
Find the right allocation for CNYE.TO and CANY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer