CNXC vs. TEP.PA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) and Teleperformance SE (TEP.PA).

Performance

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) and Teleperformance SE (TEP.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNXC Concentrix Corporation	-35.50%	-1.39%	-55.03%	-25.36%	-24.91%	81.22%	23.38%
TEP.PA Teleperformance SE	-20.98%	-11.55%	-38.78%	-37.68%	-46.08%	35.65%	2.59%

Different Trading Currencies

CNXC is traded in USD, while TEP.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the TEP.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXC achieves a -35.50% return, which is significantly lower than TEP.PA's -20.98% return.

CNXC

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: -16.37%
• YTD: -35.50%
• 6M: -43.96%
• 1Y: -49.38%
• 3Y*: -38.43%
• 5Y*: -28.06%
• 10Y*: —

TEP.PA

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: -20.98%
• 6M: -22.68%
• 1Y: -39.96%
• 3Y*: -35.82%
• 5Y*: -29.41%
• 10Y*: -2.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CNXC vs. TEP.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXC

CNXC Risk / Return Rank: 8
CNXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CNXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CNXC Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CNXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CNXC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

TEP.PA

TEP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 10
TEP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TEP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TEP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TEP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TEP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) and Teleperformance SE (TEP.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNXC	TEP.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	-0.87	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.06	-1.08	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.86	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.71	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.77	-1.20	-0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXC Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the TEP.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXC and TEP.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNXC	TEP.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.84	-0.87	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.60	-0.66	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.10	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between CNXC and TEP.PA is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Dividend Comparison

CNXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than TEP.PA's 8.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNXC Concentrix Corporation	5.21%	3.27%	2.87%	1.15%	0.77%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TEP.PA Teleperformance SE	8.48%	6.79%	4.63%	2.92%	1.48%	0.61%	0.88%	0.87%	1.33%	1.09%	1.26%	1.19%

Drawdowns

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXC drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, roughly equal to the maximum TEP.PA drawdown of -87.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXC and TEP.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNXC	TEP.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.10%	-87.08%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.31%	-51.79%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.10%	-87.08%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.10%	-86.03%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.34%	-30.64%	-15.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.74%	31.15%	-2.41%

Volatility

CNXC vs. TEP.PA - Volatility Comparison

Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) has a higher volatility of 30.37% compared to Teleperformance SE (TEP.PA) at 14.70%. This indicates that CNXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEP.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNXC	TEP.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.37%	14.70%	+15.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.07%	29.71%	+19.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.06%	45.37%	+13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.28%	43.90%	+3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.53%	37.14%	+12.39%

Financials