CNWIX vs. SEMNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX).
CNWIX is managed by Calamos. SEMNX is managed by Hartford.
Performance
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 7.40% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 3.88% | 40.36% | 7.56% | 8.80% | -22.30% | -5.11% | 23.58% | 22.12% | -15.57% | 40.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNWIX achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than SEMNX's 3.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CNWIX has underperformed SEMNX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while SEMNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.33% annualized return.
CNWIX
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -13.56%
- YTD
- 7.40%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
SEMNX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 41.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNWIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMNX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNWIX vs. SEMNX — Risk / Return Rank
CNWIX
SEMNX
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNWIX | SEMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 2.16 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 2.73 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.78 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 11.39 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNWIX | SEMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 2.16 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.21 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.51 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.25 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNWIX and SEMNX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Dividend Comparison
CNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SEMNX's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
SEMNX Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 0.77% | 2.17% | 1.22% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNWIX drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, smaller than the maximum SEMNX drawdown of -65.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNWIX and SEMNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNWIX | SEMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.57% | -65.10% | +21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -14.80% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.47% | -39.74% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.57% | -42.47% | -1.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -12.22% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -17.39% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 3.62% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CNWIX vs. SEMNX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) at 10.25%. This indicates that CNWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNWIX | SEMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.15% | 10.25% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.00% | 15.23% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 19.54% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 17.65% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 18.37% | +5.71% |