CNWIX vs. FEDIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class I (FEDIX).
CNWIX is managed by Calamos. FEDIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 4.79% | 19.29% | 14.99% | 6.60% | -24.35% | -4.70% | 54.23% | 20.76% | -17.74% | 36.97% |
FEDIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class I | 4.11% | 31.82% | -3.64% | 20.77% | -11.82% | 6.67% | 16.93% | 19.64% | -18.89% | 36.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNWIX achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly higher than FEDIX's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CNWIX has underperformed FEDIX with an annualized return of 8.36%, while FEDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.
CNWIX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
FEDIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.21%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 35.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNWIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDIX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNWIX vs. FEDIX — Risk / Return Rank
CNWIX
FEDIX
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class I (FEDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNWIX | FEDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 2.39 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 3.00 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 3.17 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 12.58 | -6.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNWIX | FEDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.39 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.55 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.61 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.51 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNWIX and FEDIX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Dividend Comparison
CNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FEDIX's 4.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.97% | 2.79% | 2.01% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.38% |
FEDIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class I | 4.51% | 4.70% | 4.01% | 2.11% | 1.79% | 11.83% | 0.55% | 1.05% | 1.84% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 0.83% |
Drawdowns
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNWIX drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FEDIX drawdown of -42.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNWIX and FEDIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNWIX | FEDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.57% | -42.98% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -9.98% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.47% | -27.42% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.57% | -42.98% | -0.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.28% | -9.58% | -6.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -8.86% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.51% | +1.66% |
Volatility
CNWIX vs. FEDIX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class I (FEDIX) at 6.44%. This indicates that CNWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNWIX | FEDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.65% | 6.44% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 9.71% | +7.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.17% | 14.33% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 13.98% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 15.65% | +8.42% |