CNQQ vs. WEEK

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) and WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech, while WEEK is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill. CNQQ is passively managed, while WEEK is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CNQQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for WEEK.

Performance

CNQQ vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQQ achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than WEEK's 1.77% return.

CNQQ

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: 4.30%
• 6M: 7.12%
• YTD: 10.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WEEK

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 1.69%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQQ vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	10.89%	-5.22%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	1.77%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQQ and WEEK is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

CNQQ vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WEEK

WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 99
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQQ vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNQQ	WEEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	8.83	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	18.22	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	4.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	28.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	247.40	—

Drawdowns

CNQQ vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQQ drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQQ and WEEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNQQ	WEEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.82%	-0.13%	-17.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.94%	-0.00%	-3.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-0.01%	-8.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNQQ	WEEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.76%	0.42%	+26.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.76%	0.39%	+26.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.76%	0.39%	+26.37%

CNQQ vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNQQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNQQ vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison

CNQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than WEEK's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	0.34%	0.09%
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF	3.66%	3.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNQQ and WEEK in my portfolio?

CNQQ and WEEK have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNQQ or WEEK?

On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNQQ or WEEK?

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNQQ or WEEK?

WEEK has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.34% for CNQQ.

What is the main difference between CNQQ and WEEK?

CNQQ is categorized as China Equities, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNQQ and 0.19% for WEEK.