PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNQ.TO having a 34.74% return and BANK.TO slightly lower at 34.14%.


CNQ.TO

1D
2.03%
1M
3.86%
6M
31.07%
YTD
34.74%
1Y
50.86%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
35.48%
10Y*
21.68%

BANK.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.97%
6M
31.83%
YTD
34.14%
1Y
70.27%
3Y*
36.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
34.74%10.42%8.27%26.98%31.02%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
34.14%41.00%27.90%16.23%-20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ.TO and BANK.TO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.21

The correlation between CNQ.TO and BANK.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ.TO
CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BANK.TO
BANK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNQ.TOBANK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

2.02

-0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

8.54

-5.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

37.73

-30.22

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ.TO and BANK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.63%, which is greater than BANK.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ.TO and BANK.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQ.TOBANK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.63%

-29.03%

-45.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.68%

-8.27%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

-15.49%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-0.08%

-10.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-8.56%

-9.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

1.87%

+4.93%

Volatility

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) at 3.88%. This indicates that CNQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNQ.TOBANK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

3.88%

+4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

10.98%

+12.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.35%

12.68%

+16.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.61%

15.62%

+14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.12%

15.62%

+22.50%

Dividends

CNQ.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than BANK.TO's 11.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund
11.71%13.73%15.28%13.60%10.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.95%5.05%6.00%8.53%12.23%7.63%11.35%7.29%8.31%5.00%4.49%6.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNQ.TO and BANK.TO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNQ.TO and BANK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer