CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE
CNIE.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CNIE.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader New China ESG, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CNIE.DE returned 1.43% vs 23.11% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNIE.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNIE.DE achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 9.05% return.
CNIE.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 1.43%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -12.97%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CNIE.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | -3.36% | 12.86% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 9.05% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNIE.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNIE.DE
QUTM.DE
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNIE.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.13 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.93 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 2.10 | -1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNIE.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.69%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNIE.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNIE.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.69% | -24.77% | -20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.74% | -24.77% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.20% | -21.73% | -3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.70% | -8.16% | -16.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.06% | 10.96% | -3.90% |
Volatility
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) is 4.92%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that CNIE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNIE.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 7.43% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 24.73% | -13.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 34.14% | -17.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 32.86% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 32.86% | -8.73% |
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNIE.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNIE.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNIE.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNIE.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUTM.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUTM.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNIE.DE.
CNIE.DE is categorized as China Equities, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. CNIE.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNIE.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNIE.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer