CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX
CNEW.AX (VanEck China New Economy ETF) and PLUS.AX (VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNEW.AX is a China Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader China New Economy Index, while PLUS.AX is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNEW.AX returned -2.86%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for PLUS.AX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNEW.AX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than PLUS.AX's 1.09% return.
CNEW.AX
- 1D
- -5.82%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- -4.07%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- -2.86%
- 10Y*
- —
PLUS.AX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 1.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNEW.AX VanEck China New Economy ETF | -4.07% | 15.14% | 11.63% | -7.15% | -26.85% | 14.22% | 26.35% | 40.10% | 1.63% |
PLUS.AX VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF | 1.09% | 5.01% | 5.49% | 7.67% | -10.32% | -2.09% | 5.51% | 8.91% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNEW.AX and PLUS.AX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX — Risk / Return Rank
CNEW.AX
PLUS.AX
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX) and VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF (PLUS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNEW.AX | PLUS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.07 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 0.39 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 0.84 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNEW.AX drawdown since its inception was -46.20%, which is greater than PLUS.AX's maximum drawdown of -16.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEW.AX and PLUS.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNEW.AX | PLUS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.20% | -16.54% | -29.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -3.81% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -3.81% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.20% | -16.54% | -29.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.44% | -0.89% | -17.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.27% | -3.57% | -13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 1.82% | +3.83% |
Volatility
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF (PLUS.AX) at 0.76%. This indicates that CNEW.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLUS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNEW.AX | PLUS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.26% | 0.76% | +7.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 2.70% | +13.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 3.63% | +16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 5.27% | +19.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.70% | 6.90% | +17.80% |
Dividends
CNEW.AX vs. PLUS.AX - Dividend Comparison
CNEW.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than PLUS.AX's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNEW.AX VanEck China New Economy ETF | 0.79% | 0.88% | 1.71% | 1.72% | 1.86% | 1.03% | 1.40% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLUS.AX VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus ETF | 3.68% | 4.15% | 3.44% | 2.99% | 3.06% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 3.41% | 2.57% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNEW.AX and PLUS.AX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNEW.AX is categorized as China Equities, while PLUS.AX is Corporate Bonds. CNEW.AX tracks MarketGrader China New Economy Index, while PLUS.AX tracks VanEck Australian Corporate Bond Plus Index.
Find the right allocation for CNEW.AX and PLUS.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer