PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF (CNDD.TO) and BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF (GDXD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDD.TO achieves a -19.97% return, which is significantly lower than GDXD.TO's -18.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDD.TO has outperformed GDXD.TO with an annualized return of -23.98%, while GDXD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -47.44% annualized return.


CNDD.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-19.97%
6M
-19.18%
1Y
-41.83%
3Y*
-30.78%
5Y*
-22.16%
10Y*
-23.98%

GDXD.TO

1D
1.07%
1M
26.07%
YTD
-18.91%
6M
-17.03%
1Y
-78.68%
3Y*
-67.32%
5Y*
-52.75%
10Y*
-47.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNDD.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF
-19.97%-39.81%-25.66%-12.09%8.98%-42.56%-36.10%-31.58%15.45%-17.95%
GDXD.TO
BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF
-18.91%-89.27%-51.09%-14.78%-30.72%-3.72%-84.19%-59.16%-6.06%-13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDD.TO and GDXD.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2007

0.35

Over the past year, CNDD.TO and GDXD.TO have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDD.TO
CNDD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
CNDD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXD.TO
GDXD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GDXD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF (CNDD.TO) and BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF (GDXD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNDD.TOGDXD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.90

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

-1.14

-0.38

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDD.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.74, which is lower than the GDXD.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDD.TO and GDXD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDD.TO and GDXD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNDD.TOGDXD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-100.00%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.84%

-87.59%

+44.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.16%

-98.32%

+26.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.87%

-98.83%

+25.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.67%

-99.95%

+6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.31%

-100.00%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.14%

-94.39%

+12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.72%

68.90%

-41.18%

Volatility

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF (CNDD.TO) is 6.96%, while BetaPro Canadian Gold Miners -2x Daily Bear ETF (GDXD.TO) has a volatility of 32.35%. This indicates that CNDD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNDD.TOGDXD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

32.35%

-25.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

73.48%

-54.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.08%

91.70%

-67.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

68.11%

-42.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.99%

68.76%

-38.77%

Dividends

CNDD.TO vs. GDXD.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNDD.TO nor GDXD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CNDD.TO and GDXD.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNDD.TO and GDXD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer