CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO
CNDD.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF) and CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDD.TO is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Global X, while CBIL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CNDD.TO returned -30.78%/yr vs 3.57%/yr for CBIL.TO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDD.TO achieves a -19.97% return, which is significantly lower than CBIL.TO's 1.03% return.
CNDD.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -19.97%
- 6M
- -19.18%
- 1Y
- -41.83%
- 3Y*
- -30.78%
- 5Y*
- -22.16%
- 10Y*
- -23.98%
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDD.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF | -19.97% | -39.81% | -25.66% | -3.32% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.03% | 2.68% | 4.47% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDD.TO and CBIL.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNDD.TO
CBIL.TO
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF (CNDD.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNDD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 5.73 | -5.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 58.57 | -59.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 327.93 | -329.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDD.TO and CBIL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.32% | -0.06% | -99.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.84% | -0.04% | -42.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.16% | -0.06% | -72.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | 0.00% | -99.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -0.00% | -82.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.72% | 0.01% | +27.71% |
Volatility
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF (CNDD.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that CNDD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDD.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 0.06% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.08% | 0.19% | +18.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.08% | 0.25% | +23.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 0.32% | +25.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.99% | 0.32% | +29.67% |
Dividends
CNDD.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNDD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.25% | 2.58% | 4.38% | 3.39% |
CNDD.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 -2x Daily Bear ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNDD.TO and CBIL.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNDD.TO is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CBIL.TO is Canadian Government Bonds.
Find the right allocation for CNDD.TO and CBIL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer