CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO).
CNCL.TO and XUU-U.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCL.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. XUU-U.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Total Market Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2019. Both CNCL.TO and XUU-U.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 3.59% | 22.73% | 17.93% | 4.66% |
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | -3.48% | 11.00% | 33.03% | 9.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
CNCL.TO is traded in CAD, while XUU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNCL.TO achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly higher than XUU-U.TO's -3.53% return.
CNCL.TO
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 25.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUU-U.TO
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 13.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNCL.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU-U.TO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNCL.TO
XUU-U.TO
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNCL.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 0.71 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 1.08 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.08 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 4.21 | +7.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNCL.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 0.71 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.82 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNCL.TO and XUU-U.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
CNCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than XUU-U.TO's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF | 8.90% | 9.15% | 11.88% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.87% | 0.83% | 0.76% | 0.85% | 1.01% | 0.77% | 0.90% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, smaller than the maximum XUU-U.TO drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCL.TO and XUU-U.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNCL.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -28.73% | +14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.35% | -12.71% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -6.82% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -5.92% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.52% | -0.15% |
Volatility
CNCL.TO vs. XUU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) at 5.39%. This indicates that CNCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNCL.TO | XUU-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 5.39% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 9.97% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 18.40% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 16.31% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 17.50% | -4.85% |