CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF (HPYB.TO).

CNCL.TO and HPYB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNCL.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. HPYB.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 16, 2026.

Performance

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF (HPYB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	1.96%
HPYB.TO Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF	1.79%

Returns By Period

CNCL.TO

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 3.59%
• 6M: 9.68%
• 1Y: 25.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HPYB.TO

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCL.TO

Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCL.TO

CNCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
CNCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CNCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CNCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CNCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CNCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF (CNCL.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF (HPYB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNCL.TO	HPYB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.42	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNCL.TO	HPYB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.42	0.61	+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between CNCL.TO and HPYB.TO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than HPYB.TO's 2.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CNCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF	8.90%	9.15%	11.88%	6.29%
HPYB.TO Harvest Premium Yield Canadian Bank ETF	2.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CNCL.TO vs. HPYB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, which is greater than HPYB.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCL.TO and HPYB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCL.TO	HPYB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.75%	-6.37%	-7.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-2.66%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-2.22%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCL.TO	HPYB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.42%	15.74%	-1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	15.74%	-3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	15.74%	-3.09%