CNAA.L vs. C300.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CNAA.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) and C300.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - CNAA.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while C300.L tracks the S&P China A 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

CNAA.L vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNAA.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 8.88%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: 35.54%
• 3Y*: 11.42%
• 5Y*: -1.13%
• 10Y*: 5.10%

C300.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CNAA.L vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNAA.L

CNAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
CNAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CNAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CNAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CNAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CNAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNAA.L vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNAA.L	C300.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNAA.L	C300.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CNAA.L	C300.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.26%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.97%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNAA.L	C300.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.48%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.49%	—	—

CNAA.L vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CNAA.L and C300.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

CNAA.L vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNAA.L nor C300.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CNAA.L or C300.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNAA.L or C300.L?

CNAA.L and C300.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

What is the main difference between CNAA.L and C300.L?

CNAA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco.