CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO
CMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units) and SMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMVP.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while SMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. CMVP.TO is passively managed, while SMAX.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, CMVP.TO returned 25.73% vs 44.38% for SMAX.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMVP.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SMAX.TO.
Performance
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMVP.TO achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than SMAX.TO's 18.79% return.
CMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 18.79%
- 6M
- 17.56%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units | 11.91% | 21.46% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 18.79% | 16.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMVP.TO and SMAX.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMVP.TO
SMAX.TO
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMVP.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.71 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 6.95 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.15 | 25.77 | -9.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMVP.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 3.61 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 2.32 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum SMAX.TO drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMVP.TO and SMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMVP.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -18.22% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -6.42% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.32% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -2.09% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.73% | -0.13% |
Volatility
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) is 3.00%, while Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that CMVP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMVP.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 5.51% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 9.72% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 12.36% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 14.62% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 14.62% | -3.54% |
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMVP.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than SMAX.TO's 13.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units | 2.72% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 13.36% | 14.67% | 13.88% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMVP.TO and SMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
CMVP.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while SMAX.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CMVP.TO and 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
Find the right allocation for CMVP.TO and SMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer