CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO
CMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units) and FCMI.TO (Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. CMVP.TO is passively managed, while FCMI.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, CMVP.TO returned 32.12% vs 18.60% for FCMI.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMVP.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FCMI.TO.
Performance
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMVP.TO achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly higher than FCMI.TO's 9.31% return.
CMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- YTD
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 27.62%
FCMI.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$769.19K | CA$841.17K | CA$642.20K | |
| CA$46.03K | CA$34.60K | CA$26.27K |
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units | 18.68% | 21.08% |
FCMI.TO Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF | 9.31% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMVP.TO and FCMI.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMVP.TO
FCMI.TO
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMVP.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.76 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 5.17 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.35 | 19.80 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum FCMI.TO drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMVP.TO and FCMI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMVP.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -63.80% | +54.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -3.62% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -18.91% | +18.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -41.51% | +40.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 0.94% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Volatility Comparison
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO) at 2.07%. This indicates that CMVP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMVP.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 2.07% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 4.93% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 6.44% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 7.80% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 22.16% | -11.28% |
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCMI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMVP.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Dividend Comparison
CMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than FCMI.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units | 2.58% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCMI.TO Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF | 3.28% | 3.38% | 3.63% | 4.09% | 3.73% | 2.76% | 6.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMVP.TO and FCMI.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FCMI.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CMVP.TO and 0.50% for FCMI.TO.
Find the right allocation for CMVP.TO and FCMI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer