CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO
CMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMVP.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CMVP.TO returned 25.73% vs 88.95% for CFOU.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMVP.TO charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMVP.TO achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.
CMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 6M
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 88.95%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 28.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units | 11.91% | 21.46% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 23.22% | 63.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CMVP.TO
CFOU.TO
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMVP.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.57 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 5.56 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.15 | 22.74 | -6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMVP.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 3.62 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 0.33 | +1.98 |
Drawdowns
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMVP.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -86.23% | +77.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -16.08% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -3.23% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -22.46% | +21.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 3.93% | -2.33% |
Volatility
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) is 3.00%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that CMVP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMVP.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 8.18% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 20.93% | -13.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 24.70% | -14.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 27.56% | -16.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 33.85% | -22.77% |
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
CMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units | 2.72% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
CMVP.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. CMVP.TO tracks Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CMVP.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer