PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMVP.TO achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.


CMVP.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.40%
YTD
11.91%
6M
14.09%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CFOU.TO

1D
-1.41%
1M
9.71%
YTD
23.22%
6M
34.47%
1Y
88.95%
3Y*
57.23%
5Y*
28.45%
10Y*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2025

0.64

The correlation between CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMVP.TO
CMVP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMVP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMVP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CMVP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMVP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMVP.TOCFOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.57

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

5.56

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.15

22.74

-6.58

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMVP.TOCFOU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

3.62

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

0.33

+1.98

Drawdowns

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMVP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.86%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMVP.TOCFOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-86.23%

+77.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-16.08%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-3.23%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-22.46%

+21.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.93%

-2.33%

Volatility

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) is 3.00%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that CMVP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMVP.TOCFOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

8.18%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

20.93%

-13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

24.70%

-14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

27.56%

-16.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.08%

33.85%

-22.77%

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMVP.TO has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMVP.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

CMVP.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. CMVP.TO tracks Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index, while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for CMVP.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMVP.TO and CFOU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer