CMTFX vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK).
CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
CMTFX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMTFX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -6.05% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.18% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CMTFX having a -6.05% return and XLK slightly lower at -6.18%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMTFX having a 21.08% annualized return and XLK not far behind at 21.00%.
CMTFX
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -6.05%
- 6M
- -4.98%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 21.08%
XLK
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -6.18%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.65%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMTFX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMTFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMTFX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
CMTFX
XLK
CMTFX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMTFX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 1.71 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.97 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 6.31 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMTFX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.64 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.87 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.36 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMTFX and XLK is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMTFX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.29% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.57% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
CMTFX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMTFX drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMTFX and XLK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMTFX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -82.05% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -15.92% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.42% | -33.56% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.42% | -33.56% | -5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.42% | -11.04% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -35.17% | +18.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 4.98% | -0.89% |
Volatility
CMTFX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 8.12%. This indicates that CMTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMTFX | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 8.12% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 16.49% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.32% | 27.05% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 24.72% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.70% | 24.33% | +0.37% |