PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMTFX vs. GNYTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (GNYTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMTFX achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than GNYTX's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CMTFX has outperformed GNYTX with an annualized return of 23.12%, while GNYTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.59% annualized return.


CMTFX

1D
5.75%
1M
-3.70%
6M
16.23%
YTD
18.56%
1Y
33.21%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
23.12%
ALL TIME*
12.43%

GNYTX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.43%
6M
-0.64%
YTD
0.23%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
1.59%
ALL TIME*
3.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
18.56%25.10%31.72%56.85%-34.63%23.04%49.65%44.21%-1.26%43.38%
GNYTX
Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
0.23%4.91%1.16%4.41%-7.24%1.47%3.66%6.60%1.10%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CMTFX and GNYTX is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2000

-0.09

The correlation between CMTFX and GNYTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMTFX vs. GNYTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMTFX
CMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

GNYTX
GNYTX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GNYTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNYTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNYTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GNYTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNYTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (GNYTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMTFXGNYTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.55

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.88

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

6.11

+0.18

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the GNYTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMTFX and GNYTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMTFX drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than GNYTX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMTFX and GNYTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMTFXGNYTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.28%

-15.58%

-52.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-2.29%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.63%

-3.32%

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.42%

-11.37%

-28.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.42%

-11.37%

-28.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-1.62%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-1.78%

-14.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

0.70%

+4.04%

Volatility

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (GNYTX) at 0.98%. This indicates that CMTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNYTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMTFXGNYTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

0.98%

+9.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

1.73%

+20.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.36%

2.09%

+24.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

2.72%

+24.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

3.21%

+22.06%

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMTFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than GNYTX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMTFX vs. GNYTX - Dividend Comparison

CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than GNYTX's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
2.61%3.09%1.02%2.23%3.36%4.19%0.87%2.44%5.89%3.60%0.35%1.74%
GNYTX
Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.57%3.57%2.60%2.30%2.30%2.38%2.33%2.82%2.95%2.73%3.14%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMTFX and GNYTX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMTFX has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to GNYTX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMTFX dropped -68.28% vs GNYTX's -15.58%.

GNYTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMTFX and GNYTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer